In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, 2018-2028 Segmented By Technology (Cell Culture Technology, High Throughput Technology, Molecular Imaging, OMICS Technology), By Application (Systemic Toxicology, Dermal Toxicity, Endocrine Disruption, Occular Toxicity, Others), By Method (Cellular Assay, Biochemical Assay, In-Silico, Ex-Vivo), By
Published Date: November - 2024 | Publisher: MIR | No of Pages: 320 | Industry: Healthcare | Format: Report available in PDF / Excel Format
View Details Buy Now 2890 Download Sample Ask for Discount Request CustomizationIn-vitro Toxicology Testing Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, 2018-2028 Segmented By Technology (Cell Culture Technology, High Throughput Technology, Molecular Imaging, OMICS Technology), By Application (Systemic Toxicology, Dermal Toxicity, Endocrine Disruption, Occular Toxicity, Others), By Method (Cellular Assay, Biochemical Assay, In-Silico, Ex-Vivo), By
Forecast Period | 2024-2028 |
Market Size (2022) | USD 16.09 billion |
CAGR (2023-2028) | 9.66% |
Fastest Growing Segment | Cell Culture Technology |
Largest Market | North-America |
Market Overview
Global In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market has valued at USD 16.09 Billion in 2022 and is anticipated to project robust growth in the forecast period with a CAGR of 9.66% through 2028. In-vitro Toxicology Testing are the scientific process of evaluating the potential toxic effects of various substances on biological systems outside of a living organism, typically in a laboratory setting. The term "in vitro" is Latin for "in glass," and it signifies experiments conducted in a controlled environment such as test tubes, culture dishes, or other artificial systems rather than in a whole living organism (in vivo). They are utilized to assess the safety of chemicals, drugs, cosmetics, consumer products, and other substances without subjecting animals or humans to potentially harmful effects. These tests provide valuable insights into the potential risks and effects of substances on cellular, molecular, and biochemical levels. In-vitro testing is also often used to screen and prioritize substances for further testing in animal models or clinical trials. In-vitro toxicology testing has several advantages over traditional animal testing, including ethical considerations, reduced cost and time, and potential for high-throughput screening. However, it also has limitations, such as the inability to fully replicate the complexity of whole organisms and potential differences in responses between in-vitro systems and living organisms. In-vitro Toxicology Testing can be categorized based on cell culture assays, Enzyme Assays, Genotoxicity Assays, Cytotoxicity Assays and High-Throughput Screening (HTS) In-vitro Toxicology Testing.
Key Market Drivers
Rising Demand For Safety Assessment Of New Drugs And Chemicals
The rising demand for safety assessment of new drugs and chemicals is a significant driver for the growth of the global in-vitro toxicology testing market. This demand is influenced by several factors that highlight the importance of in-vitro testing methods in ensuring the safety and efficacy of pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and other products.
Advances In In-Vitro Toxicology Technologies Propels the Market Growth
Advances in in-vitro toxicology technologies play a crucial role in driving the growth of the global in-vitro toxicology testing market. These technological advancements enhance the accuracy, efficiency, and predictive capabilities of in-vitro testing methods, making them more attractive and valuable for various industries.
Increased Awareness Of The Importance Of Safety Testing Drives the Market Growth
Increased awareness of the importance of safety testing plays a significant role in driving the growth of the global in-vitro toxicology testing market. As stakeholders across industries become more informed about the benefits and necessity of rigorous safety assessments, the demand for in-vitro testing methods rises. Growing awareness of animal welfare and ethical concerns associated with traditional animal testing methods has led to increased demand for alternative approaches, such as in-vitro testing. Stakeholders are increasingly recognizing the need for humane and more socially responsible testing methods. Consumer awareness and concerns about the safety of products they use, including pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and food additives, are driving demand for more thorough safety assessments. In-vitro toxicology testing provides a reliable means to evaluate potential risks and ensure consumer safety. Media coverage and advocacy campaigns focusing on the potential hazards of certain chemicals and substances have heightened public awareness of the importance of safety testing. This increased attention encourages regulatory agencies, industries, and researchers to prioritize safety assessments using advanced methods like in-vitro testing. Regulatory agencies worldwide are emphasizing the importance of comprehensive safety testing for new compounds before they are approved for commercial use. Increased awareness of regulatory guidelines and requirements prompts industries to invest in advanced testing methods like in-vitro toxicology. Greater awareness of environmental impacts and ecological considerations related to chemical exposure fuels the demand for in-vitro testing methods that can assess both human health and environmental safety.
Download Free Sample Report
Key Market Challenges
Complexity of Biological Systems
The complexity of biological systems poses significant challenges to the global in-vitro toxicity testing market. While in-vitro methods offer numerous advantages, accurately replicating the intricate interactions and dynamic processes that occur within living organisms is a complex endeavor. The challenges arising from biological complexity impact the predictive accuracy, relevance, and applicability of in-vitro toxicity testing. In-vitro models often focus on individual cell types or simplified tissues, which fail to capture the interactions between different organs, tissues, and cell types that occur in the whole organism. This limitation reduces the ability to predict systemic effects and complex physiological responses. Cells in the body interact within a specific microenvironment, including extracellular matrix, signaling molecules, and neighboring cells. Replicating these interactions in in-vitro models is challenging, potentially leading to altered cellular behavior and responses.
Limited Relevance for Some Endpoints
The limited relevance of some endpoints in in-vitro toxicity testing poses challenges to the global market. While in-vitro methods offer valuable insights into many aspects of toxicity, there are certain complex and multifaceted toxicological endpoints that may not be well-captured by these models. This limitation affects the ability of in-vitro testing to fully replace traditional animal testing and impacts its application in certain regulatory and research contexts. Some toxicological effects, such as immune responses, hormonal regulation, and organ-specific toxicities, involve intricate interactions between various cell types, tissues, and physiological processes. In-vitro models often cannot fully replicate these complex mechanisms. Chronic toxicity and long-term effects, such as carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity, are challenging to assess in short-term in-vitro assays. These endpoints require a comprehensive understanding of how substances interact with the body over extended periods, which is difficult to capture in simplified in-vitro systems. Many toxicological responses involve the integration of multiple pathways and processes. In-vitro models may not fully capture the synergistic or cumulative effects that occur in vivo.
Long-Term and Chronic Effects
Assessing long-term and chronic effects poses significant challenges to the global in-vitro toxicity testing market. In-vitro methods are often designed for short-term experiments and may not fully capture the complex and dynamic nature of chronic exposures and their associated effects. This limitation affects the ability of in-vitro testing to predict and assess the long-term impact of substances, especially in contexts such as chronic diseases, carcinogenicity, and reproductive toxicity. In-vitro assays are typically conducted over short time frames, which may not be sufficient to observe and understand time-dependent processes that occur in chronic exposures, such as accumulation of damage or gradual development of adverse effects. Chronic exposures can lead to cumulative effects over time, which are difficult to replicate in short-term in-vitro experiments. These cumulative effects may result from repeated exposures, metabolic processes, or progressive damage to cellular components.
Key Market Trends
Personalized Medicine Applications
Personalized medicine applications represent a significant trend in the global in-vitro toxicity testing market. Personalized medicine aims to tailor medical treatment to the individual characteristics of each patient, including their genetic makeup, lifestyle, and environmental factors. In the context of in-vitro toxicity testing, personalized medicine applications involve assessing how an individual's unique genetic and physiological characteristics influence their response to potential toxicants. In-vitro toxicity testing can be used to evaluate how a patient's specific genetic and molecular profile influences their susceptibility to adverse effects from chemicals and drugs. This approach enables more accurate and personalized risk assessments, helping to identify individuals who may be particularly sensitive to certain substances. By using patient-derived cells or tissues, researchers can conduct in-vitro toxicity testing to predict how an individual's body might respond to a particular compound. This information can guide treatment decisions and drug choices to maximize efficacy and minimize risks for each patient. In-vitro toxicity testing can help identify biomarkers or specific molecular indicators that signal potential toxic responses in certain individuals. These biomarkers can be used to monitor and predict toxicity in real-time during treatment. In-vitro toxicity testing can play a crucial role in identifying compounds that may lead to adverse reactions in specific patient populations. By selecting safer alternatives based on personalized testing, the risk of adverse effects can be significantly reduced.
Segmental Insights
Technology
In 2022, the In-vitro Toxicology Testing market was dominated by the reactive Cell Culture Technology and is predicted to continue expanding over the coming years. Cell culture technology is a highly accurate and reliable method for toxicity testing. This is because cells can be grown in a controlled environment and can be exposed to a variety of toxicants.
Application Insights
In 2022, the In-vitro Toxicology Testing market was dominated by systemic toxicology segment and is predicted to continue expanding over the coming years. Regulatory agencies require comprehensive safety assessments of chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and consumer products to ensure human health and environmental safety. Systemic toxicity testing is a crucial aspect of these assessments, as it provides valuable information about the potential adverse effects of substances on different organs and systems.
Method Insight
In 2022, the In-vitro Toxicology Testing market was dominated by cellular assay segment and is predicted to continue expanding over the coming years.
End-User Insight
In 2022, the In-vitro Toxicology Testing market was dominated by pharmaceutical industry segment and is predicted to continue expanding over the coming years. The pharmaceutical industry is constantly developing new drugs to treat a variety of diseases. In-vitro toxicity testing is used to assess the safety of these drugs before they are tested in humans.
Download Free Sample Report
Regional Insights
The North America region has established itself as the leader in the Global In-vitro Toxicology Testing Market. The pharmaceutical industry in North America is one of the most advanced and productive in the world. This is driving the demand for in-vitro toxicity testing to assess the safety of new drugs. Regulatory agencies in North America, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), require the use of in-vitro toxicity testing for the safety assessment of new drugs. This is to ensure that these drugs are safe for human use. There have been significant advances in in-vitro toxicity technologies in recent years. These advances have made it possible to develop more accurate and reliable tests that can be used to assess the safety of new drugs.
Recent Developments
- In August2023, The Charles River laboratories international,Inc. (CRL) announced today the scheduled opening of the Charles Riveraccelerator and development lab, Charles River Accelerator®, in Seattle andPhiladelphia. Charles River Accelerator® Seattle is Charles River’s latestinvestment in Seattle. The company’s first facility opened in 2021 in responseto the rapidly expanding city’s position as a leading life sciences center withstrong start-up and business growth. CRADL® Seattle is set to open thisSeptember and responds to the growing demand for more dynamic vivarium space,as well as in vivo on-demand study support services. As a leading contractvivarium provider, Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) is committedto expanding the capacity of its biopharmaceutical facilities to meet thegrowing demands of the industry.
- In August2021, Sidebar Image Pete Coody Dr. Martin Cole Partnering with ERSS Laboratoryin Hercules, North America Center of Testing Excellence Hercules, North AmericaErosion and Radioactivity (E&O) Testing Erosion Detection and Reactivation(EDR) Environmental Fate & Metabolism Testing.
- In August2023, Evotec, a clinical phase biotechnology company, today announced that itis partnering with the world’s leading small molecule RNA modifying enzyme(RME) drug discovery company (STORM) to present the discovery of STORM’s leadclinical candidate (STC-15) at its Fall 2023 conference (ACS). “STC-15” wasco-developed and developed by Evotec and STORM, a company focused on thediscovery and development of novel small molecule therapeutics (NMTs) focusedon oncology (cancer) and other diseases. STC-15 is a highly selective, orallybioavailable, and RME inhibitor for METTL3.
Key Market Players
- CharlesRiver Laboratories International, Inc.
- SGSS.A.
- MerckKGaA
- EurofinsScientific
- AbbottLaboratories
- LaboratoryCorporation of America Holdings
- EvotecS.E.
- ThermoFisher Scientific, Inc.
- QuestDiagnostics Incorporated
- AgilentTechnologies, Inc.
By Technology | By Application | By Region |
|
| North America Europe Asia Pacific South America Middle East & Africa |
Table of Content
To get a detailed Table of content/ Table of Figures/ Methodology Please contact our sales person at ( chris@marketinsightsresearch.com )
List Tables Figures
To get a detailed Table of content/ Table of Figures/ Methodology Please contact our sales person at ( chris@marketinsightsresearch.com )
FAQ'S
For a single, multi and corporate client license, the report will be available in PDF format. Sample report would be given you in excel format. For more questions please contact:
Within 24 to 48 hrs.
You can contact Sales team (sales@marketinsightsresearch.com) and they will direct you on email
You can order a report by selecting payment methods, which is bank wire or online payment through any Debit/Credit card, Razor pay or PayPal.
Discounts are available.
Hard Copy